View Single Post
  #14  
Old 01-09-2010, 11:03 AM
riversdad riversdad is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8
Some are of the opinion that to let Whirling disease take it's course it may ultimately be better for the river. It only affects rainbows, and the rainbows that don't get it produce offspring that are immune to the disease. Many rivers that were attacked were caught up in debate as to what to do and as a result - doing nothing turned out to be the best option. I am not agreeing with doing nothing but it certainly belongs in the debate.
Reply With Quote